Teams

Yadkin/Harris/18 3.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 3.0 - Wednesday Night

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-30vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesClaire Devon vs Carly Rosenkampff1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Allen vs Christina Soriano2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSophie Maiocchi vs Carol Parker3-4, 0-0
2025-07-23vs Yadkin/Georgitis/18+3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Samantha Talbott7-6, 6-0
2025-07-16vs Yadkin/Griggs/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesKelly Dugan vs Amy Mills2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWhitney Newell vs Sarah Kaplan0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSophie Maiocchi vs Hillary Stevens2-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Teresa Cervantes6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKatie Allen vs Cathy Ralston4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesKelly Dugan vs Penn Broughton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Victoria Boysen6-3, 6-1
2025-07-02vs Yadkin/Georgitis/18+3.0Lost 01
L#3 SinglesWhitney Newell vs Deana Georgitis1-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs Yadkin/Griggs/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesClaire Devon vs Chenequa Ceasar6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSophie Maiocchi vs Torin Liberthson-Brown3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesWhitney Newell vs Chanel Griggs3-6, 4-6
2025-06-11vs Yadkin/Georgitis/18+3.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesClaire Devon vs Melanie Brost1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKelly Dugan vs Alyssa Howards3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-04vs Yadkin/Griggs/18 3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Torin Liberthson-Brown6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKatie Allen vs Chanel Griggs6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - Wednesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Ashley Peters
published 3.5
3.22
Betsy Harris
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.96
Katie Allen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.87
Claire Devon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Whitney Newell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.73
Kelly Dugan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Natalie Jennings
published
Sophie Maiocchi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Peters
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3
Betsy Harris
38W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Katie Allen
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Claire Devon
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Whitney Newell
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kelly Dugan
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Natalie Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophie Maiocchi
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.