Teams

Forever Young

2025 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - Ventura Women · Ventura - Women 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesAnne Williamson / Marti Spencer vs Susan Cass / Laura Mealer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Gache / Diane Hendrickson vs Renae Saliano / Marilyn Hewitson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane ODell / Marti Spencer vs Susan Friedman / Mary Scotti2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Susie Castle / Selina Cheng6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Selina Cheng / Lynda Balletta6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Lynne Krueger vs Marilyn Hewitson / Lesley Moverley1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesVirginia McConnell / Marti Spencer vs Susan Friedman / Brenda Kyser6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Jane ODell vs Susan Cass / Selina Cheng6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Covington / Lynne Krueger vs Susan Friedman / Brenda Kyser2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Nancy Pierson
published
3.28
Debra Becker
published 4
3.22
Jane ODell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Anne Williamson
published 3.5
3.11
Virginia McConnell
published
2.99
Marti Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Diane Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Leslie Gache
published
Lynne Krueger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Hendrickson + Leslie Gache1539% games+0.7% vs expected
Diane Hendrickson + Jane ODell5553% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Krueger + Diane Hendrickson3646% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Pierson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Debra Becker
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Jane ODell
64W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Anne Williamson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Virginia McConnell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Marti Spencer
144W–198L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Diane Hendrickson
90W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Leslie Gache
8W–25L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
0
Lynne Krueger
37W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.