Teams

LJJO-Joiner/NMP

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 18 9:30 AM
North Mecklenburg Park
Sep 25 11:00 AM
River Run Country Club
Oct 2 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Jennifer Joiner
Oct 9 9:30 AM
North Mecklenburg Park
2026-09-11vs LNCH-Cheatham/PACWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Mcguirk / Gina Martin vs Charlene Whichel / Kayes Mary Lynn6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Patterson / Barbara King vs Jennifer Jenkins / Elizabeth Norton6-2, 6-4
2026-09-04vs LWKI-King/CSDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Kennard / Melinda Urban vs Tanner Jordan / Marilou Martin3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPaige Mcguirk / Karla Williams vs Emalie Levine / Christina Mullen4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Joiner / Kathy Ciambotti vs Melissa Collins / Sharyn Darden6-4, 6-4
2026-08-28vs LSCL-Clancy/CRPWon 30
W#1 DoublesJodi Patterson / Monica Galloway vs Filomena Ferri / Barbara Kosior5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Kennard / Barbara King vs Stephanie Clancy / Margaret Vermillion2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Mangano / Karla Williams vs Jessica Benningfield / Katrina Childers7-5, 6-3
2026-08-21vs LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/PeninsulaWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Mangano / Gina Martin vs Tracie Persinger / Lisa Carlyle7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Foreman / Christine Bogojevich vs Kira Skill / Christine Tattersfield6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Joiner / Kathy Ciambotti vs Lisa Moyer / Brooke Hondros2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-14vs LMKPO-Portaro/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaige Mcguirk / Gina Martin vs Buket Boucher / Dina White4-6, 5-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Kennard / Melinda Urban vs Keri Norcross / Shannon Hirschfeld4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Joiner / Samantha Warren vs Mary Kay Portaro / Colleen Ludington6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Elizabeth Foreman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Mangano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Lisa Yee
published
3.67
Paige Mcguirk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Jodi Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Jennifer Joiner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.47
Christine Bogojevich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Gina Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Samantha Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Karla Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Monica Galloway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Melinda Urban
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Kathy Ciambotti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Barbara King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kelly Kennard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Galloway + Christine Bogojevich7358% games+6.8% vs expected
Karla Williams + Monica Galloway4449% games+1.8% vs expected
Jennifer Joiner + Paige Mcguirk1540% games−15.2% vs expected
Karla Williams + Paige Mcguirk8356% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Foreman + Paige Mcguirk134 matchesnot enough data
Karla Williams + Christine Bogojevich213 matchesnot enough data
Christine Bogojevich + Melinda Urban213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Foreman
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Elizabeth Mangano
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Lisa Yee
7W–17L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Paige Mcguirk
89W–76L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Jodi Patterson
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Joiner
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.65
3.5
Christine Bogojevich
163W–96L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Gina Martin
19W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Samantha Warren
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Monica Galloway
147W–99L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Melinda Urban
129W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Kathy Ciambotti
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara King
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Kelly Kennard
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.