Teams

SILVER CREEK CW5.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 5.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Michelle Ney
published
Catherine Plaia
published 3.5
3.21
Nelli Dijkhuizen
published
3.10
JULIE PHAM
published 3.5
2.61
Katie Wilson
published
2.56
Valentyna Danilov
published
2.53
Narimane Soliman
published
2.51
Sarah Barragan
published
2.48
Cindy Monroe
published 3
2.43
Maricel Manibo
published
2.39
Diane Foley
published 3
2.38
Syeda Badar
published
2.32
Lenore Arnold
published
2.31
Stuti Badoni
published
Wendy Treves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuti Badoni + Valentyna Danilov1532% games−8.3% vs expected
Syeda Badar + Cindy Monroe044 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Barragan + Maricel Manibo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Ney
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Catherine Plaia
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nelli Dijkhuizen
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
JULIE PHAM
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Katie Wilson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Valentyna Danilov
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Narimane Soliman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Sarah Barragan
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Cindy Monroe
2W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48
Maricel Manibo
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
3
Diane Foley
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39
Syeda Badar
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38
Lenore Arnold
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
Stuti Badoni
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.31
Wendy Treves
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.