Teams

HCC M. Sheridan

2023 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11vs Sun City - L. GreenleeWon 10
W#3 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Gatchina Hessler vs Melody O'Sullivan / Marti Turocy6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-04vs River Hills - T. ManganelloWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarie Teixeira / Janene Culumber vs Teresa Manganello / Sherri Bornstine4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Gatchina Hessler vs Brigitte Paola / Allison Townsend6-2, 6-4
2023-02-25vs Apollo Beach - R. KenyonLost 02
L#2 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Dorothy Crosse vs Theresa Anderson / Janet George3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeb Goist / Patricia Wright vs Debra Bell / Audrey Cull4-6, 3-6
2023-01-21vs Florida/Wilson/55&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheri Couch / Marie Teixeira vs Kim Fernald / Melanie Clem5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDeb Goist / Patricia Wright vs Melany Jablonski / Karen Abrams4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-01-14vs HCC ArmagostLost 02
L#1 DoublesDorothy Crosse / Irene Nasworthy vs Lindsey Robbins / Anne Butler5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Clarke / Deb Goist vs Kelly Armagost / Leticia Leppert3-6, 2-6
2023-01-07vs Cheval - D. JacksonWon 10
W#2 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Dorothy Crosse vs Janice Fisher / Sara Schnieders6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Deborah Nicklaus
published 4.5
3.77
Irene Nasworthy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Deb Goist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gatchina Hessler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Marie Teixeira
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.31
Sheri Couch
published
3.18
Janene Culumber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Susan Clarke
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Nicklaus
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Deb Goist
70W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Gatchina Hessler
41W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Teixeira
19W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Melissa Sheridan
27W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Sheri Couch
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Janene Culumber
67W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Susan Clarke
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.