Teams

WTC - Poston 6.5 Combo

2025 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-18vs WTC - Deck 6.5 ComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gonzalez / Margaret Poston vs Jessica Deck / Chelsea Petrey5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Amanda Roberson vs Caroline Dozier / Jenny Nelson2-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs WTC - Deck 6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Edwards / Jennifer Gonzalez vs Carie Crowley / Carol Hundley6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Poston / Callie Ventress vs Robin O'Sullivan / Evee Ventress6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Perry / Amanda Roberson vs Jessica Deck / Karelia Castillo1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-02vs WTC - Deck 6.5 ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesVicki Bitney / Amanda Roberson vs Carie Crowley / Chelsea Petrey1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Caitlin Perry vs Caroline Dozier / Evee Ventress6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Gonzalez / Margaret Poston vs Cathy Ogilvie / Katie Lewis6-1, 7-5
2025-09-01vs WTC - Deck 6.5 ComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gonzalez / Margaret Poston vs Cathy Ogilvie / Evee Ventress6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Caitlin Perry vs Carol Hundley / Jenny Nelson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caitlin Perry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Callie Ventress
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Margaret Poston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Allison Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Allison Necessary
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlin Perry + Allison Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caitlin Perry
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Callie Ventress
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Margaret Poston
19W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Vicki Bitney
4W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
2.5
Allison Necessary
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%33%67%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.