Teams

SKY BLUE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesRockwell Pearson / Jeffrey Raval vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-29vs CACM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Raval / Bob Sullivan vs Randal Ankeney / Daniel Chin4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Jeremy Thomas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-15vs CACM GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeffrey Raval vs Jonah Staller / Tab McGinley4-5
2023-08-10vs LEBTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Jeffrey Raval vs Edward Partlow / Richard Selim4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-25vs GTC GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Jeremy Thomas vs James Hull / Ian Ross4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Kendrick McLish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Rockwell Pearson
published
3.70
Bob Sullivan
published 4
3.65
Greg Rogers
published
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
published
3.64
Jeremy Thomas
published
3.64
Conn Flanigan
published 4
3.42
Jeffrey Raval
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Sullivan + Kendrick McLish6156% games+11.7% vs expected
Bob Sullivan + Jeremy Thomas4550% games+0.2% vs expected
Kendrick McLish + Jeremy Thomas4453% games−1.3% vs expected
Rockwell Pearson + Conn Flanigan3253% games−3.8% vs expected
Jeremy Thomas + Rockwell Pearson314 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Tamkin + Conn Flanigan224 matchesnot enough data
Bob Sullivan + Rockwell Pearson123 matchesnot enough data
Greg Rogers + Kendrick McLish123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kendrick McLish
67W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Rockwell Pearson
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bob Sullivan
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Greg Rogers
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.65
Jeremy Thomas
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Conn Flanigan
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jeffrey Raval
89W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.