Teams

ETC:RJII:LaPierre

2023 WMA Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesAmnat Chittaphong / Jairahadeep Singh vs Randy Yanoshak / Nathan Baker3-6, 6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Coffey / David O'Sulivan vs David Pickett / Jeffrey Robinson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesArmand Wray / Scott Schneider vs Jason Thomas / Joshua Brody6-4, 6-0
2023-04-01vs EHRC:Nutmeg:Passan/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesTushin Shah / Amnat Chittaphong vs Sean Passan / Carlos Boltes-Palma5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Coffey vs Brendan Moynihan6-7, 4-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Nero / Marc LaPierre vs Sam Strong / Hayder Eli3-6, 2-6
2023-03-11vs BAY:Allons-y:VoisinLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristian Polanco / Jairahadeep Singh vs Didier Voisin / Ira Brezinsky6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmnat Chittaphong vs Thomas Terry6-4, 0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Schneider / Armand Wray vs Peter Rosskothen / Brian Sullivan1-6, 2-6
2023-02-12vs Enfield Racket Jockies:Pickett/MyersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesFred Kelly / Michael Nero vs Justin Crawford / John Garde2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Coffey vs Nick Azar6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTushin Shah / Amnat Chittaphong vs Randy Yanoshak / Joshua Brody6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesArmand Wray / David O'Sulivan vs David Pickett / Jeffrey Robinson5-7, 4-6
2023-01-29vs EHRC:Nutmeg:Passan/MillerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Nero / Fred Kelly vs Randy Miller / Pavlos Papasavas2-6, 6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAdam Coffey vs Brendan Moynihan5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmnat Chittaphong / Tushin Shah vs Dan Michaud / Hayder Eli6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesArmand Wray / David O'Sulivan vs Jie Huang / Gary Granger2-6, 1-6
2023-01-08vs BAY:Allons-y:VoisinLost 13
W#1 DoublesChristian Polanco / Tushin Shah vs Didier Voisin / Thomas Terry6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmnat Chittaphong vs Tucker Swan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarc LaPierre / Jeff Johnston vs Jay Smith / Saul Kuhr3-6, 6-1, 2-5
L#3 DoublesMichael Nero / Scott Schneider vs Dale Frank / Ira Brezinsky6-7, 6-2, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EHRC:Nutmeg:Passan/Miller062138131
2BAY:Allons-y:Voisin06121227206
3ETC:RJII:LaPierre06101430241
4Enfield Racket Jockies:Pickett/Myers0632142270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Fred Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Christian Polanco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Marc LaPierre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Michael Nero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Tushin Shah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Armand Wray
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Adam Coffey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Amnat Chittaphong
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Scott Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jairahadeep Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jairahadeep Singh + Tushin Shah9452% games+7.0% vs expected
Marc LaPierre + Jairahadeep Singh5157% gamesnot enough data
Amnat Chittaphong + Tushin Shah4157% gamesnot enough data
Christian Polanco + Tushin Shah2342% gamesnot enough data
Tushin Shah + Michael Nero4157% gamesnot enough data
Christian Polanco + Marc LaPierre314 matchesnot enough data
Christian Polanco + Jairahadeep Singh303 matchesnot enough data
Marc LaPierre + Armand Wray303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fred Kelly
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Christian Polanco
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
Marc LaPierre
85W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
2.94
Michael Nero
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Tushin Shah
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Armand Wray
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Adam Coffey
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amnat Chittaphong
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Scott Schneider
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jairahadeep Singh
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.