Teams

Houston Christian - Serve-ivors

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-14vs Cross Creek - AngelsLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Hellman-Diego / Vivian Huang vs Diane Wheaton / Anna Arante3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Sulaiman / Sarah McKenney vs Angeli Zhang / Holly Miday2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlicia Halphen / Whitney Rudolph vs Grace Best / Ada Sun1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesElama Ogunro / Ayten McCormick vs Harmeet Kohli / Christine Cardiff5-7, 3-6
2025-01-31vs New TerritorySplit 22
L#1 DoublesEmily Warnecke / Vivian Huang vs Molly Glath / Claire Reekie2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Vulpis / Annika Bermudez vs Nelda Prince / Kathe Baker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAyten McCormick / Sarah Hartwell vs Samiye Ardic / Monica Jordan1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesCaroline Meade / Isabella Nguyen vs Mary Ann Asnaashari / Elissa Baker6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Vivian Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Samantha Vulpis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Danielle Talbot
published 4
3.56
Whitney Rudolph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Isabella Nguyen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Emily Warnecke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Diana Molina
published 3.5
3.50
Sarah Hartwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Patricia Sulaiman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Caroline Meade
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Emma Haywood
published
3.35
Ayten McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
3.32
Elama Ogunro
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Karen Hellman-Diego
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Sarah McKenney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Alicia Halphen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Annika Bermudez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janet Balke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Chaluparambil + Isabella Nguyen6261% games+8.7% vs expected
Whitney Rudolph + Diana Molina3352% games+3.8% vs expected
Ayten McCormick + Karen Hellman-Diego1449% games−0.3% vs expected
Vivian Huang + Emily Warnecke4252% gamesnot enough data
Ayten McCormick + Elama Ogunro2348% gamesnot enough data
Ayten McCormick + Diana Molina3251% gamesnot enough data
Elama Ogunro + Diana Molina213 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Rudolph + Emily Warnecke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vivian Huang
110W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.85
Samantha Vulpis
57W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.82
4
Danielle Talbot
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Whitney Rudolph
27W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Isabella Nguyen
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Emily Warnecke
57W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Diana Molina
43W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Sarah Hartwell
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Patricia Sulaiman
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Caroline Meade
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Emma Haywood
36W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ayten McCormick
50W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Christine Chaluparambil
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Elama Ogunro
33W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Hellman-Diego
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Sarah McKenney
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Alicia Halphen
27W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Annika Bermudez
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Balke
5W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.