Teams

LA - Century City

2022 SoCal Doubles Weekday - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

16 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-14vs LA - MountainGateSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebra Holstein / Sona Arutyunyan vs Shelley Leboff / Antonieta Monaldi6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMartina Mass / Haleh Emrani vs Heidi Shepherd / Karen Haltrecht0-6, 5-7
2022-10-24vs LA - VermonstersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeannette Hartsock / Vilayvanh Shah vs Holly Lieberenz / Karen Vidal3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Sona Arutyunyan vs Leah Lavin / Julie Woolenberg4-6, 4-6
2022-09-19vs LA - VermonstersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSona Arutyunyan / Vilayvanh Shah vs Rosalyn Daniels / Karen Vidal7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMartina Mass / Haleh Emrani vs Lisa Klingenberg / Amelia Bolker3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Alexia Monti
published 4.5
4.14
Sona Arutyunyan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Vilayvanh Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Jeannette Hartsock
published
3.69
Susan Raifman
published
3.65
Martina Mass
published
3.65
Haleh Emrani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lisa Licht
published
3.63
Helena Schwartz
published 4
3.48
Rachel Werner
published
3.45
S Arnold
published
3.38
Julie Watts
published
3.35
Mary Kayne
published
3.31
Rachel Edwards
published
3.29
Arianne Rudes
published 3.5
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vilayvanh Shah + Sona Arutyunyan361557% games+2.1% vs expected
S Arnold + Martina Mass1444% games−7.8% vs expected
Jeannette Hartsock + Martina Mass404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Monti
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Sona Arutyunyan
174W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Vilayvanh Shah
194W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Jeannette Hartsock
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Susan Raifman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Martina Mass
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Haleh Emrani
40W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Lisa Licht
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Helena Schwartz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rachel Werner
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
S Arnold
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Julie Watts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Mary Kayne
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
Rachel Edwards
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Arianne Rudes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.