Teams

Wrisley 40s 4.5W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Abraham 40s 4.5W Mon AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Beverly Tuttle vs Leigh Abraham / Blair Barnett0-6, 5-7
2025-04-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Susan Parsons vs Julie Cooke / Beth Bell7-6, 7-6
2025-04-21vs Vandeplancke 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Susan Parsons vs Felicia Price / Catherine Tanner7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-31vs Abraham 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Susan Parsons vs Jennifer Jacobs / Angela McGinn7-6, 6-4
2025-03-24vs Alvarino/Churchill 40s 4.5W Mon AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesRolinde Cleyman / Heidi Wrisley vs Beth Bell / Kathryn Egerton5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDabney Porter / Jessica Smith vs Michele Alvarino / Blair Churchill2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Shafer / Beverly Tuttle vs Kelly Parr / Melissa Beeson0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Vandeplancke 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Beverly Tuttle vs Kim Hunt / Felicia Price6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kristi Collins
published
3.81
Heidi Wrisley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Erin Huffines
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Beverly Tuttle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Andrea Shafer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Dabney Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Catherine Stopka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Mary Sexton
published
3.31
Rolinde Cleyman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Tuttle + Catherine Stopka4448% games−3.2% vs expected
Beverly Tuttle + Dabney Porter3640% games−7.0% vs expected
Dabney Porter + Kristi Collins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Collins
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
Erin Huffines
173W–129L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Andrea Shafer
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Dabney Porter
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Catherine Stopka
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Rolinde Cleyman
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.