Teams

MR:Schaffer/Epstein

2024 WMA Tri-Level Spring (2024) · 4.0 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-07vs ETC:Team EdwardsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Ikumi Kayama vs Marna Shields / Samantha Edwards6-2, 6-4
2024-06-05vs ETC:Team EdwardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Schaffer / Ikumi Kayama vs Samantha Edwards / Susan Katsoulis6-4, 3-5, 0-1
2024-05-11vs LTC:Hit and Run:WillardWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Ashley Schaffer vs Ann Kochis / Amy Willard6-2, 6-1
2024-05-08vs BAY:BaxterWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Jacqueline Bagwell vs Suzanne Baxter / Phoebe Gelbard6-2, 6-0
2024-04-24vs BAY:BaxterWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Ashley Schaffer vs Suzanne Baxter / Phoebe Gelbard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-16vs LTC:Hit and Run:WillardWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Schaffer / Jacqueline Bagwell vs Amy Willard / Ana Gremli6-1, 6-1
2024-04-03vs BOUS:Mountain GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Ashley Schaffer vs Wendy Federer / Janet Lee6-1, 6-0
2024-03-30vs BOUS:Mountain GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Ashley Schaffer vs Yulia Bougouin / Janet Lee6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MR:Schaffer/Epstein7171334
2BOUS:Mountain Girls26261381

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Jacqueline Bagwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Rachel Epstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Ashley Schaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ikumi Kayama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Schaffer + Rachel Epstein251457% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Bagwell
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Rachel Epstein
149W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Ashley Schaffer
158W–108L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
Ikumi Kayama
40W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.