Teams

Duval/Carter/40&Over3.5W

2024 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-17vs Baymeadows - GrayWon 10
W#2 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Elba Massena vs Cindy Wilkinson / Kelly Kuchera6-4, 6-1
2024-03-16vs Baymeadows - GrayWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Carter / Lillian Cutaj vs Jill Gray / Kimberly Rogers6-3, 6-2
2024-02-25vs Huguenot - WatersWon 20
W#1 SinglesLillian Cutaj vs Judith Daniel6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCary Leinan / Elizabeth Paul vs Karen Miller / Debbie Bucca4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-02-15vs The Yards - JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesYvonne Carter / Lillian Cutaj vs Alixe Stamatogiannakis / Randi Guthard6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCary Leinan / Mary Francis vs Kelly Sams / Whitney Jones6-2, 7-5
2024-02-11vs Deercreek - BoyleLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl McCormack / Lillian Cutaj vs Jill Cole / Julie Korsog4-6, 2-6
2024-01-21vs Jax Golf - ValinhoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCary Leinan vs Melissa Carr3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTiffany Brassfield / Lillian Cutaj vs Theresa Merriam / Robin Boyles6-3, 6-3
2024-01-14vs Glen Kernan - KozackWon 10
W#2 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Elizabeth Kerian vs Connie Rouls / Lois Robichaud6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Elizabeth Kerian
published 4
3.73
Stephanie Mock
published
3.66
Lindsay Murthy
published
3.66
Yvonne Carter
published
3.51
Lillian Cutaj
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Cary Leinan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Shannon Maura
published
Elba Massena
published 3.5
3.25
Tiffany Brassfield
published
3.23
Elizabeth Paul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jeanne Kerr
published
Monica Moore
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Kerian
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Stephanie Mock
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Lindsay Murthy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
Yvonne Carter
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Lillian Cutaj
88W–51L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Cary Leinan
30W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
Shannon Maura
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Elba Massena
23W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiffany Brassfield
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Paul
6W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Jeanne Kerr
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Moore
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.