Teams

Knoch-Dohlin: Tennis the Menace

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-24vs ICC 18 3.0Won 41
W#1 DoublesMegan Knoch-Dohlin / Hannah Siegel vs Andriana Roth / Mollie Ritter6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKathleen Danner vs Katy Farley6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Graham / Molly Matsumoto vs Heather Burns / Kathryn Aronson6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKayla Malik vs Maria Bloomfield6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAstrid Knott / Rana Khoury vs Erin Schultz / Katherine Warner3-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs Rabago/MacAriola: Tough LoveLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Vegoe / Kelly Vegoe vs Bernadette MacKey / Rachel Johnson6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKayla Malik vs Wendy Liu6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly Matsumoto / Alison Goering vs Jennie Szorcsik / Adona Rabago1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAstrid Knott / Jennifer Ericson vs Maria Cecilia Ray / Marie Stodolka6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-01vs OlsonLost 03
L#1 SinglesKathleen Danner vs Ilana Fromer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Goering / Kayla Malik vs Melissa Khaira / Maya Khaira2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMegan Knoch-Dohlin vs Wendy Nguyen0-6, 0-6
2025-06-19vs Schoenecker Summer 3.0 S25Lost 14
W#1 DoublesEmily Vegoe / Kelly Vegoe vs Ann Cadwell / Christina Hughes6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKathleen Danner vs Mary Frances Price2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ericson / Alison Goering vs Alisa Chase / Karen Kasner0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGina Shuck vs Liz Schoenecker4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAstrid Knott / Rana Khoury vs Uyen Pham / Mary McDermott5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesEmily Vegoe / Kelly Vegoe vs Allison Jopke / Kathleen Hultman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKayla Malik vs Htoo Say0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Matsumoto / Jennifer Ericson vs Julie Hoffer / Colleen Malmgren3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAstrid Knott / Rana Khoury vs Kimberly Miller / Alexa Hoffer7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Rabago/MacAriola: Tough LoveLost 23
L#1 DoublesKathleen Danner / Kelly Vegoe vs Kimberly Reed / Maureen Wollak2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHannah Siegel vs Wendy Liu6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKimberly Graham / Molly Matsumoto vs Adona Rabago / Tina Wagenbach7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKayla Malik vs Lisa Andreasen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAstrid Knott / Rana Khoury vs Maria Cecilia Ray / Marie Stodolka2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Kathleen Danner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Hannah Siegel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Molly Matsumoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Gina Shuck
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kayla Malik
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.65
Emily Vegoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Megan Knoch-Dohlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.55
Kelly Vegoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Jennifer Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Alison Goering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Astrid Knott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Rana Khoury
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Vegoe + Emily Vegoe6551% games+7.9% vs expected
Megan Knoch-Dohlin + Hannah Siegel6454% games+6.8% vs expected
Kelly Vegoe + Kathleen Danner0630% games−8.2% vs expected
Rana Khoury + Astrid Knott0635% games−9.1% vs expected
Megan Knoch-Dohlin + Kathleen Danner1440% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ericson + Rana Khoury134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ericson + Astrid Knott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Danner
16W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Hannah Siegel
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Molly Matsumoto
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Gina Shuck
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Kayla Malik
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Emily Vegoe
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Megan Knoch-Dohlin
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Kelly Vegoe
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Ericson
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Alison Goering
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Astrid Knott
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rana Khoury
13W–29L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.