Teams

Happy Feet 4.0

2025 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.73 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-01vs Rubino 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Jessica Somers1-6, 2-6
2025-05-31vs Wangstas 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesRuzica Ragontse vs Yiziying Chen4-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnto Faini / Sandy Thongphok vs Corinne Chau / Layna Kelly1-6, 1-6
2025-05-28vs Ball Busters 4.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAnto Faini / Bethany Henderson vs Michele Bloom / Cheryl Hughes5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Jemine Bryon6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSanghee Lee / Cintya Leveque vs Susan Lapetina / Tria Thalman4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Beale / Sandy Thongphok vs Christine Bragale / Sharon Huang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-19vs break a string 18+ 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Wendy Beale vs Winny Zhang / Wen Jiang6-7, 1-6
2025-05-18vs Fairbanks 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesCintya Leveque / Sanghee Lee vs Kim Hazel / Darcie Hammer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-10vs Wangstas 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesYunden Jinsmaa / Ruzica Ragontse vs Liz Christensen / Crystal Cornell4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Yiziying Chen0-6, 5-7
2025-05-08vs Rubino 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesRuzica Ragontse vs Sherry Altman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Beale / Carrie McIntyre vs Janet Wu / Zoie Acadia6-4, 6-2
2025-05-03vs Ball Busters 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Martha Nolan vs Sharon Huang / Susan Umans6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSanghee Lee / Cintya Leveque vs Cece Finan / Terry Cocozza6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Chanpen Teeranon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-27vs break a string 18+ 4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Winny Zhang6-2, 6-1
2025-04-15vs Fairbanks 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesRuzica Ragontse vs Lindsay Eberhart6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYunden Jinsmaa / Anto Faini vs Janet Opar / Robin Burton6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Martha Nolan
published
3.93
Ruzica Ragontse
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.70
3.69
Carrie McIntyre
published 3.5
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.67
Desiree Drakakis
published 4
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.62
Tricia Muneses
published
3.60
Maria Vassileva
published
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.47
Wendy Beale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
published
3.40
Cintya Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.32
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.21
Andrea Burkert
published 3.5
3.17
Mesanie Lee
published
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanghee Lee + Tricia Muneses4170% games+4.0% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Jelena Mitrovic314 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Beale + Sandy Thongphok213 matchesnot enough data
Tina Halley + Sandy Thongphok123 matchesnot enough data
Sanghee Lee + Cintya Leveque303 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Thongphok + Tricia Muneses213 matchesnot enough data
Jelena Mitrovic + Martha Nolan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Nolan
43W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Ruzica Ragontse
83W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Bethany Henderson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Carrie McIntyre
33W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Desiree Drakakis
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Tricia Muneses
43W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–200L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–231L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Burkert
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Mesanie Lee
24W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.