Teams

Babu/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-11vs Buhalis/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDodson Randolph / Jessica Warren vs Maria Schoonover / Kim Miles6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicole Babu / Cristin Hambidge vs Kelly Cole / Dawn Bowen1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Myers / Sarah Enstice vs Kim Thompson / Christy Briggs6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Katherine Goodson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Christy Hermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Christy Sallee
published 4
3.54
Lisa Yawn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Nicole Babu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Jessica Warren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Lissa Jarnigan
published
3.35
Cristin Hambidge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Katie Ouellette
published
3.28
Dodson Randolph
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Kate Tharp
published
3.10
Kelly Stanley
published
3.09
Sarah Enstice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Jenny Pankow
published
2.88
Nicole Hogue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dodson Randolph + Christy Sallee4164% games+8.6% vs expected
Kate Tharp + Lissa Jarnigan4649% games+5.5% vs expected
Cristin Hambidge + Nicole Babu16854% games+3.5% vs expected
Christy Sallee + Jessica Warren3445% games−6.2% vs expected
Lisa Yawn + Jessica Warren134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Yawn + Cristin Hambidge123 matchesnot enough data
Dodson Randolph + Jessica Warren213 matchesnot enough data
Dodson Randolph + Nicole Babu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Goodson
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Christy Hermann
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Christy Sallee
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lisa Yawn
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Nicole Babu
37W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jessica Warren
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Lissa Jarnigan
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Cristin Hambidge
30W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Katie Ouellette
27W–28L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Dodson Randolph
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kate Tharp
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Stanley
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sarah Enstice
28W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Jenny Pankow
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Nicole Hogue
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.