Teams

SGV Glendora Rebels-McNulty-Dawson Park/SA12:30

2025 Mixed Doubles - 40 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-31vs SGV LLW Racketeers-Ramirez-WN/SU8Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRudy Bituin / Karen Dacayo vs Lisa Arellanes / Mike White2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Tkach / Helene Maietta vs Kay Taylor / Robert Mann1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Dancy / Stacey McCarroll vs Jasmine M Liu / Vernon Price2-6, 3-6
2025-05-03vs SGV LLW Racketeers-Ramirez-WN/SU8Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarl Barbata / Karen Dacayo vs Debra Sudo / Robert Mann0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCerena Cooper / Shih-Ching Wang vs Lisa Arellanes / Troy de la Cruz6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelene Maietta / John Tkach vs Debbie Carmody / Vernon Price3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Patricia McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carl Barbata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Juliette Roberts
published
2.72
Karen Dacayo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Kam Jara
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Helene Maietta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Shih-Ching Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Irma Martinez
published
2.50
Cerena Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Stacey McCarroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Dancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Tkach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rudy Bituin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patricia McNulty
74W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Carl Barbata
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Juliette Roberts
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Karen Dacayo
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Kam Jara
69W–132L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Helene Maietta
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
Shih-Ching Wang
8W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Irma Martinez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Cerena Cooper
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Stacey McCarroll
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Gregory Dancy
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Tkach
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rudy Bituin
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.