Teams

Stephens/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-13vs Robinson/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesMadison Fair / Courtney Hall vs Elizabeth Levine / Catherine Warfield3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBianca Soma vs Abigail Regan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Kenny / Cynthia Madson vs Rachel Devries / Hayley Robinson6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKatie Laughinghouse vs Huntley Robinson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Geng / Anne Ammons vs Rebecca Shah / Rusti Greene6-0, 6-0
2026-04-06vs Johnson/DeVane/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesVesna Pavlovic / Ashwini Kashelikar vs Brandy Johnson / Christina Leadon6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBianca Soma vs Kaitlin Andrews4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElisa Hill / Cynthia Madson vs Tracy Aszkler / Louisa Bateman6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJane Decker vs Jessica Osullivan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Katharine Buliga vs Caitlyn Wilson / Erikka Yurjevich6-1, 6-0
2026-03-30vs Bowers/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesMonica Kenny / Natalie Geng vs Ashley Bryan / Caroline Gannon6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJane Decker vs Ellie Lawson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Hall / Madison Fair vs Shauna Bowers / Austyn Barnes6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAlison Ryan vs Tessa Sowell4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Kerry Elam vs Mary Oxford / JoBeth Currie6-4, 6-3
2026-03-19vs Bowers/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesNatalie Geng / Elisa Hill vs Stephanie Mehr / Tessa Sowell6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBianca Soma vs Justine Schwartz6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Hall / Katharine Buliga vs Garrett Massey / Austyn Barnes6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAlison Ryan vs Emma Saddler6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMonica Kenny / Anne Ammons vs Dianne Garland / Jenna Gunnels1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Alison Ryan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.96
Kerry Elam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Ashwini Kashelikar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Katie Laughinghouse
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Natalie Geng
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Jane Decker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Monica Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Madison Fair
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Bianca Soma
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.77
Cynthia Madson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Katharine Buliga
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Anne Ammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashwini Kashelikar + Vesna Pavlovic4269% games+12.4% vs expected
Anne Ammons + Monica Kenny10262% games+9.2% vs expected
Cynthia Madson + Elisa Hill3350% gamesnot enough data
Madison Fair + Elisa Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vesna Pavlovic
36W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
3
Alison Ryan
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Kerry Elam
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Ashwini Kashelikar
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Katie Laughinghouse
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Natalie Geng
25W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jane Decker
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Monica Kenny
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Madison Fair
15W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Bianca Soma
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Katharine Buliga
14W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Anne Ammons
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.