Teams

ACP.Narayanan

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-29vs TOC.SwainLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Wooten / Cary Armstrong vs Katherine Barron / Susan Brogden3-6, 6-7
2024-07-24vs BENT.WagnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCary Armstrong / Carol Wooten vs Pamela Godwin / Gloria Hale6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-22vs TOC.BlancLost 01
L#1 DoublesCary Armstrong / Ashley McRae vs Christine Hunt / Aulia Tandradinata6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-15vs PW.BologaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKasani Amore / Ashley McRae vs Julie Evans / Sarah Burkey6-1, 6-3
2024-07-01vs TING.LowranceLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Alison Neeley vs Colleen Sacco / Valerie Wallace3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDisha Narayanan / Grace Miller vs Tracy Lowrance / Kimberly Latzy0-6, 0-6
2024-06-24vs MD.ScrogginsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Nikiel / Cary Armstrong vs Angie Bostrom / Allie Ligay6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKasani Amore / Disha Narayanan vs Meredith Heath / Brinette Myers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-10vs TOC.HutchensLost 01
L#1 DoublesKasani Amore / Ashley McRae vs Kendra McAdory / Kim Goll3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-03vs TOC.HugginsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCary Armstrong / Alison Neeley vs Karen Hepp / Suzanne Jeska3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cary Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Ashley McRae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Kasani Amore
published
2.67
Disha Narayanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Carol Wooten
published 3
2.62
Jennie Yeung
published
2.55
Alison Neeley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Catherine Nikiel
published 2.5
Courtney Ponder
published 2.5
2.24
Brittany Friedman
published 2.5
1.90
Michele Chambers
published
Jaclyn Ponder
published
Sheri Peck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Neeley + Disha Narayanan1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cary Armstrong
97W–62L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
3.5
Ashley McRae
164W–154L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kasani Amore
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Disha Narayanan
30W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Carol Wooten
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Jennie Yeung
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%20%80%
2.62
3
Alison Neeley
44W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Catherine Nikiel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Courtney Ponder
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Brittany Friedman
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Michele Chambers
1W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Jaclyn Ponder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheri Peck
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.