Teams

LATA40/JOYE/LCC

2024 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-11vs LATA40/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Sklar / James Gantt vs Jeffrey Anderson / Gerald Simpson3-6, 3-6
2024-04-04vs LATA40/TURNER/CAMPLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Sklar / John Hillis vs Michael Turner / Michael Benton4-6, 4-6
2024-03-21vs LATA40/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Sklar / John Hillis vs Frank Sansone / Steve Swalgren6-0, 6-0
2024-03-14vs LATA40/Balazs/MWWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Sklar / John Hillis vs Bob Hawsey / Alexander Paris6-1, 6-3
2024-03-07vs LATA40/Jordan/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Gantt / Steve Sklar vs Van Horton / Jim Redick1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-29vs LATA40/Tollison/SSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Sklar / John Hillis vs Stephen Dilworth / Robert Denter6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Eric Holt
published
3.46
Steve Sklar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Brian Heaberlin
published 3.5
3.29
Ben Secoy
published 3.5
Calvin Mccoy
published 3.5
Dale Meermans
published 3.5
3.18
Andy Harmon
published 3.5
3.15
James Joye
published
3.14
William Ricken
published
3.05
Mike Steinbacher
published
3.04
John Hillis
published
3.03
James Gantt
published
Lucas Berresford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Sklar + Brian Heaberlin2349% games−6.6% vs expected
Calvin Mccoy + Andy Harmon213 matchesnot enough data
Andy Harmon + James Gantt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Holt
30W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Steve Sklar
159W–113L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Brian Heaberlin
12W–20L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ben Secoy
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Calvin Mccoy
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dale Meermans
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Andy Harmon
43W–23L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
James Joye
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
William Ricken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Mike Steinbacher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
John Hillis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
James Gantt
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Lucas Berresford
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.