Teams

SAN JOSE SR 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.27
Elyse Goldman
published
3.22
Jane Ensor
published
3.20
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.17
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.13
Jan Immer
published
3.10
Sherri Terao
published
3.05
Megan Polhemus
published
3.03
Kristin Giammona
published
3.01
Sheila Hutchinson
published
2.75
Haik Russell
published
2.72
Amanda Ramos
published 3
2.50
Luann Wiggenhorn
published
2.40
Eunyoung Feucht
published
Kathleen Aldridge
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jo Lee + Dana Knapp134 matchesnot enough data
Jan Immer + Amanda Ramos033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Lee + Jane Ensor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Elyse Goldman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jane Ensor
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dana Knapp
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Mary Jo Lee
10W–26L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Jan Immer
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sherri Terao
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Megan Polhemus
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kristin Giammona
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–30L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Haik Russell
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Amanda Ramos
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Luann Wiggenhorn
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Eunyoung Feucht
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.40
Kathleen Aldridge
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.