Teams

LBible-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-24vs CMills-UNCLost 01
L#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Dana Cantrell1-6, 1-6
2025-11-18vs KLaan-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesRagini Singh vs Courtney Sparr6-1, 6-1
2025-11-15vs LBaxter-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Bingjie Li3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Tracy Crowley6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Lisa Baxter2-6, 6-7
2025-11-07vs MLong-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Joyce Robinson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-03vs KMasood-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Corinne Haywood3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Jordan Wilkins6-2, 6-1
2025-11-01vs SFranks-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Kimberly Donica2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-22Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Katherine Brigham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-20vs CMills-UNCLost 01
L#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Anne Cable3-6, 0-6
2025-10-20vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Anne Confer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Ana Goodwin6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Andrew Moon6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-13vs LKulp-SVCWon 10
W#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Ashlyn Zebrowski2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Nsimba Mahungu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Shelly Guo
published
3.16
Marianne Gildea
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Kathleen Young
published
2.89
Julia Haslett
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nsimba Mahungu + Ragini Singh314 matchesnot enough data
Ragini Singh + Julia Haslett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3
Nsimba Mahungu
67W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Shelly Guo
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Marianne Gildea
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kathleen Young
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Julia Haslett
47W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.