Teams

Tichacek (Dante Fascell)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-11-17vs Lamis (Coral Pine)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnders Madsen / Mike Tichacek vs Jason James / William Jimenez0-6, 1-6
2022-11-10vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJaime Perez Montes / Mike Tichacek vs Neil Bazain / Hermogenes Lopez7-6, 6-4
2022-11-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs Felipe Lahrssen6-2, 7-5
2022-10-30vs Taco TennisSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs Jose Luis Petit6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMike Tichacek vs Marcos Baez1-6, 0-6
2022-10-27vs Vitello (Doral Park)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs David Suzana4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMike Tichacek / Anders Madsen vs Maury Moreno / Roberto Mangupli3-6, 0-6
2022-10-20vs Leon (Deering Bay)Won 10
W#1 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs Ross Daniels6-1, 6-4
2022-10-12vs Tennis Addicts (Tamiami Tennis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPedro Caramuru / Daniel Hsueh vs Adrian Ledo / Pedro Nunez6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnders Madsen / Mike Tichacek vs Sergio Barth / Jose Vera0-6, 1-6
2022-10-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs Ransley Carpio6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMike Tichacek / Sirick Wohlers vs Alejandro Abdala / Carlos Rodriguez6-2, 6-2
2022-09-22vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Split 11
W#1 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs ANIBAL MONTES6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Tichacek / James Hawkins vs Schubert Sengupta / Leonardo Concha1-6, 3-6
2022-09-21vs Garcia- 3.0 winners (Tropical Park)Split 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Hsueh vs Cesar Orejarena1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnders Madsen / Mike Tichacek vs Luis Lamas A / ROLANDO MENDOZA6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Daniel Hsueh
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.54
Lawrence Chen
published
3.09
Anders Madsen
published 3.5
2.57
Mike Tichacek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Emilio Zapata
published
Jeff Cunningham
published
Juan de la Madriz
published
Thierry Isambert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Hsueh
113W–55L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Lawrence Chen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Anders Madsen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 8 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
Emilio Zapata
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Cunningham
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Juan de la Madriz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thierry Isambert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.