Teams

2-KEller-ENO

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-25vs 3-KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Anne Confer7-5, 6-3
2024-11-18vs 1-NDolan-HRWon 20
W#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs CLARE MURRAY6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-04vs 6-KTravis-EVWon 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Amber Oberle6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKarli Eller vs Julie DeConto6-2, 6-2
2024-10-28vs 7-KGreen-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Joan St Laurent6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKarli Eller vs Keshia Green6-0, 6-3
2024-10-21vs 4-LBible-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Ekaterina Seregina1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Samantha Collins6-3, 6-1
2024-10-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Laura Carlson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Elizabeth Chan
published
3.60
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.54
Laurie Straube
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Karli Eller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarah Franks
published
Kathryn Kabat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karli Eller + Mary Jo Dunnington21761% games+5.7% vs expected
Karli Eller + Cathy Joyce4255% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Franks + Laurie Straube4154% gamesnot enough data
Karli Eller + Laurie Straube224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Chan + Sarah Franks303 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Straube + Mary Jo Dunnington123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
123W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
Elizabeth Chan
34W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
255W–118L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Laurie Straube
169W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Karli Eller
162W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
Kathryn Kabat
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.