Teams

CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 M, Stuckey (DCC)

Fall CIN Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Men, M

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 DoublesEdward Bentley / Bill Jerrow vs Jeffrey Campbell / Terrence Kirby5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEdward Bentley vs Mike Petry0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBill Jerrow / Michael Phillips vs Theodore Thompson / Jeffrey Campbell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Michael Phillips vs Mike Petry / James Casselman3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAdam Hunter vs Joe Copeland0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Michael Phillips vs Theodore Thompson / William Hazelwood6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoe Stuckey / Adam Hunter vs Terrence Kirby / James Casselman6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Michael Phillips vs Theodore Thompson / William Hazelwood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoe Stuckey / Bill Jerrow vs Bob Slowikowski / Joe Copeland0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Michael Phillips vs Bob Slowikowski / Jeffrey Campbell6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Hardy / Bill Jerrow vs Joe Copeland / Terrence Kirby0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Tom Hardy vs Mike Petry / Sean Clauson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Hunter vs Armando Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Men, M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 M, Petry (INDP)6116515143
2CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 M, Stuckey (DCC)1651634235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Hunter
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andy Powers
published 3
2.37
Bill Jerrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Edward Bentley
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Jonathan Wade
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adam Hunter
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Andy Powers
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bill Jerrow
0W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.37
Edward Bentley
1W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Wade
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.