Teams

A6 ACAC Davis C.C. Crushers!

2021 Richmond Combo Mixed · Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-06vs A12 Belmont Arnold BallisticLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Adams / Tracey Watson vs Lee Wilson / Stacey Johnson2-6, 5-7
2021-10-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen Chandler / Natalie Lewis vs Brian Culley / Cynthia Dunivan3-6, 1-6
2021-10-23vs A8 Westwood Cosby CrushersLost 01
L#3 DoublesBert Teachey / Elena Carter vs Matthew Cline / Donna Bearman5-7, 2-6
2021-10-10vs A7 WOCC BlackwoodLost 02
L#2 DoublesBert Teachey / Jean Davis vs Jessica Morton / Stephen Mathews0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Chandler / Natalie Lewis vs Natalie Dunton / James Cooper4-6, 1-6
2021-09-26vs A2 Bon Air MillerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJason Ruth / Tracey Watson vs Laurent Beausergent / Daniela Otto3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Lewis / Ken Hatcher vs William Falls / Janet Miller0-6, 3-6
2021-09-19vs A11 MAC HuangWon 10
W#3 DoublesJason Ruth / Tracey Watson vs Laurie Malheiros / Amadeus Malheiros5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kristen Walton
published
3.72
Bert Teachey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Michelle Nelson
published
3.51
Tracey Watson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Steve Leighty
published
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
3.27
Craig Carman
published 3.5
3.26
Stephen Chandler
published
3.24
Thomas Wilson
published
3.23
Elena Carter
published 3.5
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.10
Natalie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Davis + Ken Hatcher303 matchesnot enough data
Jean Davis + Steve Leighty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Walton
35W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Bert Teachey
119W–144L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Michelle Nelson
12W–24L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Tracey Watson
135W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.51
Steve Leighty
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Craig Carman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Thomas Wilson
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elena Carter
19W–15L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.