Teams

Han/Borges

2021 18&Over Men Manhattan · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-30vs Lee/BachrachLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaman Nimmala / Wilson Heredia vs Max Bernstein / Ray Yen1-6, 3-4
2021-06-24vs Metro: PhamWon 21
L#2 DoublesMatthew Scott / Will Heidmann vs Brian Polen / Robert Pees6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMarkus Sandholm vs Walter Alarkon6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Kennis / Mahir Patel vs Seth Rosner / Kim Long Pham7-5, 6-3
2021-06-17vs ChoyWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarkus Sandholm vs Helcio Santos6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMatthew Scott / Sam Sloman vs Nathan Clark / Alex Goldberg6-3, 6-3
2021-06-12vs JhaveriWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Ha / Markus Sandholm vs Tiziano Barberi / Lewis Santoni6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrey Krishenik vs Roberto Torres6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Kennis / Wilson Heredia vs Perry Levy / Patrick Locke6-4, 6-2
2021-06-07vs Dainton/DermanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarkus Sandholm vs Joseph Tabak6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Scott vs Jules Antigua1-6, 2-6
2021-05-22vs Mcinnis/AvilaLost 02
L#1 SinglesAndrey Krishenik vs Chadrick Hamilton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMahir Patel / Matthew Scott vs Peter Hsieh / Mikko Tesalona1-6, 3-6
2021-05-18vs Lee/BachrachLost 12
W#1 SinglesAndrey Krishenik vs Rolston Braithwaite6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLewis Han / Matthew Scott vs Theodore Ross / Thomas Rinaldi0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Kennis vs Simon Rubin2-6, 3-6
2021-05-07vs Metro: PhamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Kennis / Matthew Scott vs Patrick Luib / Brian Polen2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrey Krishenik vs Chase Grubman6-2, 6-4
2021-04-29vs ChoySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Scott / Will Heidmann vs Alvin Choy / Helcio Santos1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarkus Sandholm vs Guillermo Zubillaga6-1, 6-1
2021-04-22vs JhaveriWon 20
W#1 DoublesArthur Borges / Markus Sandholm vs Christopher Moody / Christopher Sturgeon6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatthew Scott / Vaibhav Bajpai vs Nicholas Tam / Amish Jhaveri6-0, 6-4
2021-04-18vs Dainton/DermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArthur Borges / Markus Sandholm vs Eric Drath / Kevin O'Malley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Scott / Nikhil Mehra vs Michael Thompson / Juan Santamaria2-6, 4-6
2021-04-07vs Mcinnis/AvilaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Shnayder / Matthew Scott vs Brian Pan / Theron McInnis7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrey Krishenik vs Chadrick Hamilton3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dainton/Derman012352250432
2Lee/Bachrach012312965513
3Han/Borges012273267538

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Matthew Kennis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrey Krishenik
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.32
Kevin Han
published
2.87
Matthew Scott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Evan Siegal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Markus Sandholm
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Nikhil Mehra
published
Wilson Heredia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Kennis
63W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Andrey Krishenik
26W–22L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Han
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Matthew Scott
31W–54L career · 10 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
2.87
Evan Siegal
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Markus Sandholm
19W–9L career · 13 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nikhil Mehra
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wilson Heredia
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.