Teams

Team Phung

2022 Calvert Mixed 18 & Over · Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-12vs Team RomanekWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Marley / Nhi Phung vs Lori Romanek / Jonathan Griner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-10vs Team RomanekLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Marley / Nhi Phung vs Jonathan Ferrell / Ashly Blair3-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs Team RomanekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristina Lebron / Michael Cui vs Kelly Grimes / Jennifer Arthur6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLes Lebow / Becky Lebow vs Lori Romanek / Jonathan Griner4-6, 1-6
2022-05-05vs Team RomanekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNhi Phung / Les Lebow vs Lori Romanek / Kelly Grimes3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Lebow / Michael Cui vs Jennifer Arthur / James Borell7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-03vs Team RomanekWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Cui / Becky Lebow vs Maria Birnkammer / Jonathan Griner6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKristina Lebron / Alan Griffin vs FREDERICK DONOVAN / Carol Donovan6-1, 6-2
2022-04-21vs Team RomanekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlan Griffin / Nhi Phung vs FREDERICK DONOVAN / Cindi Hodskins6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLes Lebow / Kristina Lebron vs Kelly Grimes / Jennifer Arthur1-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs Team RomanekWon 10
W#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Michael Cui vs Carol Donovan / Jonathan Griner6-3, 6-0
2022-04-14vs Team RomanekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNhi Phung / Les Lebow vs Ashly Blair / Jonathan Ferrell0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Cui / Becky Lebow vs Lori Romanek / Kelly Grimes6-3, 7-5
2022-04-12vs Team RomanekWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlan Griffin / Kristina Lebron vs FREDERICK DONOVAN / Carol Donovan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Clayton Coker
published 4
3.70
Bruce Willhide
published 4
3.40
Nhi Phung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kristina Lebron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Casey MCFANN
published 3.5
2.99
Patricia Louden
published
2.88
Becky Lebow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Catherine Wynne
published 3
Michael Cui
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Coker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Bruce Willhide
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Nhi Phung
88W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Kristina Lebron
63W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Casey MCFANN
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Patricia Louden
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Becky Lebow
36W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Michael Cui
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.