Teams

6.TOC.George

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-06vs 1.TOC.TownsendLost 02
L#1 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Olga Stephens2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Melanie Waldron vs Jessica McIntyre / Vanese Clough4-6, 4-6
2022-04-27vs 5.PW.NelsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Renee Stegman1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Parham / Cosette Philpot vs Valerie Short / Erin Nelson0-6, 0-6
2022-04-22vs 3.TOC.GibsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Hellner / Sandhya Gopal vs Anne Farmer / Robin Evans6-2, 6-3
2022-04-01vs 2.TOC.KearnsWon 20
W#2 DoublesMelissa George / Mary Hellner vs Colleen Derks / Nancy Myer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Southern vs Debra Reuther7-6, 6-1
2022-03-25vs 4.LOCH.EarnestLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Michelle Hoyles5-7, 4-6
2022-03-11vs 1.TOC.TownsendSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Ashley Kerr2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNora Stacey / Cosette Philpot vs Allison Sheehan / Elizabeth Black4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-04vs 3.TOC.GibsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Nora Stacey vs Ruth Coon / Joey Gibson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLeslie Roth / Cosette Philpot vs Anne Farmer / Robin Evans2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Cindy McCullough
published 3.5
3.02
Melanie Waldron
published
2.89
Melissa George
published
2.85
Karen Southern
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.69
Paula Bullock
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.66
Mary Hellner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Shannon Parham
published
2.30
Cosette Philpot
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Bullock + Karen Southern2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy McCullough
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melanie Waldron
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Karen Southern
87W–112L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Paula Bullock
100W–139L career · 10 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Mary Hellner
55W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Cosette Philpot
30W–74L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.