Teams

SKY GREEN

2025 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-18vs LTFC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Sheila Baker / Kathleen Bisaccia6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Crockett / Silke Larson vs Judy Mickelson / Tina Burton6-4, 6-2
2025-06-11vs KC-RH ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSilke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy vs Kelly Mair / Jennifer Manta6-1, 6-3
2025-06-04vs HW BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Bridgette Ward / McKay Pittman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Murphy / Silke Larson vs Kristin Middlebrooks / Kelly Kane6-2, 7-5
2025-05-28vs VC PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCasidy Mcnally / Silke Larson vs Kimmie Carey / Merrell Aspin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Marcy Howey vs Annie Cordova / Dana Schoonover2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-21vs GCC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Casidy Mcnally vs Katherine Crisham / Lizzie Vann0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Marcy Howey vs Meghan Callaway / Holly Song2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-20vs EM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Lisa Ide / Sarah Olney6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Murphy / Silke Larson vs Andrea Lauricella / Brooke Bolinske6-2, 6-0
2025-05-14vs RRTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Hillary Biskner / Marissa Murray6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Erin Mann vs Amy Anema / Liz Shepard5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kelly Gloeckler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Jocelyn Murphy
published
2.83
Jennifer Rigsby
published
2.81
Amy Crockett
published 3
2.78
Silke Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Casidy Mcnally
published 3
2.63
Erin Mann
published
2.34
Cynthia Frandsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jocelyn Murphy + Silke Larson281257% games+1.1% vs expected
Erin Mann + Amy Crockett4352% games−4.4% vs expected
Silke Larson + Cynthia Frandsen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Gloeckler
63W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jocelyn Murphy
32W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Jennifer Rigsby
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Amy Crockett
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Silke Larson
126W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Casidy Mcnally
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Mann
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Cynthia Frandsen
40W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.