Teams

Simply Smashing

2023 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-12-10vs PapadropshotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Richards / Laura Haney vs Kim Daniels / Sarah Schrieber3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlexis McCary / Mesanie Lee vs Maria Vassileva / Carmen Scurato6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Lisa Thomas vs Danielle Woo / Mary Beth Etherton6-4, 7-5
2023-12-01vs The MojitosWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Gowen / Meaghan McHugh vs Nancy Trimble / Shalen Fairbanks6-1, 6-4
2023-11-18vs RubinoLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Gowen / Mesanie Lee vs Tria Thalman / Nicola Goren2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Meglyn Lansing vs Heather Sine / Shan Wang3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Opar / Loan Nguyen vs Cora Ho / Katya Vert-Wong6-3, 5-2
2023-11-14vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsay Eberhart / Laura Haney vs Evelyn Chan / Karen Jones1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Thomas / Meaghan McHugh vs Robin Brille / Elizabeth Levy7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-03vs MaciaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Opar / Andrea Motley vs Carol Gover / Telesia Hundley1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Eberhart / Debra MacDonald vs Valerie Stoehr / Liz Price5-7, 5-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Gowen / Loan Nguyen vs Dora Macia / Tamar Henkin6-3, 6-0
2023-10-26vs The MojitosSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSherri Capurso / Lisa Thomas vs Cecilia Jones / Mary Ellen Staggers7-6, 5-5
L#3 DoublesLinda Gowen / Mesanie Lee vs Michele Glidden / Desiree Nichtula7-5, 6-7
2023-10-20vs RubinoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexis McCary / Meaghan McHugh vs Zoie Acadia / Carolyn Greis1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Opar / Esther Wang vs Jessica Somers / Shan Wang2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Eberhart / Laura Haney vs Ruxandra Badiu / Cora Ho5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-10-15vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Rotiroti / Janet Opar vs Frankie Lawrence / Sherry Altman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-10vs PapadropshotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Gowen / Andrea Motley vs Kim Daniels / Jennie Kim0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Opar / Loan Nguyen vs Laleh Mosavati / Robin Khan6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSherri Capurso / Lisa Thomas vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Joanne Rome6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-06vs MaciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Gowen / Esther Wang vs Carol Gover / Liz Price5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Riette van Laack vs Elizabeth Pugh / Jessica Seedyke3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Meaghan McHugh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Alexis McCary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Riette van Laack
published
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
3.41
Sherri Capurso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Linda Gowen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Janet Opar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
Andrea Motley
published 3.5
3.18
Meglyn Lansing
published
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
Loan Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + Debra MacDonald241455% games−2.3% vs expected
Janet Opar + Laura Haney1643% gamesnot enough data
Janet Opar + Linda Gowen2446% gamesnot enough data
Janet Opar + Debra MacDonald3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meaghan McHugh
115W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Alexis McCary
143W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Riette van Laack
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Rani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Sherri Capurso
86W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Linda Gowen
56W–94L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Janet Opar
71W–154L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Motley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meglyn Lansing
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 1 line in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.