Teams

Glen Kernan - Alexander

2026 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs FYC - MartenLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Kaye / Cheryl Matthews vs Holly Williams / Katrina Torres6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVictoria Gomez vs Sally Peebles2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSujata Wagh / Kim Alexander vs Victoria Beerman / Monica Hentschel3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmber Kenney vs Abigail Lynch4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGina Stakem / Ning Gao vs Emily McVicker / Sara Bertoch6-2, 6-2
2026-06-14vs Palencia - KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Michelle Rossier vs Alexis Kokolias / Tracy Smith7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Matthews / Nancy Kaye vs Krista Kroc / Sarah Denson7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Humphrey / Ning Gao vs Arthi Reddy / Ann Chellemi6-1, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Eagle Harbor - RouseLost 01
L#1 DoublesSujata Wagh / Gina Stakem vs Daiva Nixon / Anne Kugler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-24vs Planet Swim - EulenfeldWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Alexander / Gina Stakem vs Amy Henley / Sheila Pensotti6-3, 6-0
2026-05-17vs Palencia - KrocWon 50
W#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Michelle Rossier vs Tracy Smith / Lorraine Turcotte6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVictoria Gomez vs Krista Kroc6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGina Stakem / Cheryl Matthews vs Meagan Zeller / Sara Seifert6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Humphrey vs Caroline Maxwell6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Hastings / Kim Alexander vs Shannon Regil / Ann Chellemi6-0, 6-1
2026-05-03vs ABCC - WolfelWon 32
L#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Michelle Rossier vs Christine Creveling / Beata Nowakowska1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Humphrey vs Bridget Wolfel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Kaye / Gina Stakem vs Amy Newbern / Maria Quiros6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesCheryl Matthews vs Emily Hall2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Alexander / Sujata Wagh vs Jo Adcock / Monica O'Connor6-3, 6-1
2026-04-26vs Duval/CordellLost 23
W#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Michelle Rossier vs Jennifer Ream / Elizabeth McKillop6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVictoria Gomez vs Kara Bosworth0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Alexander / Cheryl Matthews vs Jamie Lewis / Rachel Natoli3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Humphrey vs Brieanna Blaylock6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBetty Ticoras / Paula Williams vs Nelda Guerra-Smith / Michelle Do Amaral6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-13vs Sawgrass - ConlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Stakem / Nancy Kaye vs Stacey Mayer / Kathleen Allen1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Gina Stakem
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Nancy Kaye
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.07
Cheryl Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
3.06
Kristin Humphrey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.92
Sujata Wagh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Kim Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Michelle Rossier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Amber Kenney
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Betty Ticoras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Ning Gao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Jaime Gibbs
published
2.67
Victoria Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kim Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristina Santiago
published
Paula Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Flynn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Rossier + Amber Kenney4245% gamesnot enough data
Gina Stakem + Nancy Kaye303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Kaye + Cheryl Matthews303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Stakem
15W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Nancy Kaye
18W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Cheryl Matthews
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Kristin Humphrey
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Sujata Wagh
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kim Alexander
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Michelle Rossier
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amber Kenney
24W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Betty Ticoras
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ning Gao
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jaime Gibbs
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Victoria Gomez
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Kim Hastings
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kristina Santiago
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Williams
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sally Flynn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.