Teams

ALACHUA - JTC - Schafer

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-02vs WS - BradyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Schafer / Juan Torres vs Ray Brady / David Therriault6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-18vs WS - Ferguson/SpinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Boris Kuchuk vs Christopher Bumgarner / Timothy Ferguson7-6, 6-2
2022-05-07vs DB - LaiWon 10
W#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Ed Stark vs Jerry Lu / Xiaoping Zhang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs WS - Ferguson/SpinkLost 01
L#1 DoublesEd Stark / Scott Thompson vs Cory Hanson / Enrique Vargas6-7, 3-6
2022-04-16vs DB - LaiWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Scott Thompson vs Xiaoping Zhang / Guanghua Yan7-6, 7-6
2022-04-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Chad Schafer vs John Flowers / Edward Schmidt6-0, 6-1
2022-04-03vs WS - Ferguson/SpinkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Schafer / Marko Suvajdzic vs Rick Melzer / Enrique Vargas6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Thompson / Ed Stark vs Christopher Bumgarner / Nathan Whitaker6-2, 6-2
2022-03-27vs DB - LaiWon 10
W#3 DoublesEd Stark / Chad Schafer vs Kevin Smith / Jian Pu6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Juan Torres
published
3.63
Boris Kuchuk
published 4
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
William Haveman
published
3.38
Ed Stark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Marko Suvajdzic
published
3.21
Mark Diblin
published
2.88
Brian Shenker
published 3.5
Scott Rowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Schafer + Ed Stark8263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Torres
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Boris Kuchuk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
William Haveman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Marko Suvajdzic
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
Mark Diblin
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brian Shenker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
Scott Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.