Teams

CCW MCCLELLAND

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-08vs CSRC EVANSWon 10
W#1 SinglesTroy Kittelson vs Phillip Patton6-0, 6-1
2021-09-01vs FLYHS TABORWon 10
W#1 DoublesTroy Kittelson / Lance McClelland vs Kevin Wright / Ryan Saxby6-2, 6-3
2021-08-27vs CCW SCOTTWon 20
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Michael Cook vs Chad Davis / Zachary Wasser6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTroy Kittelson / Nathan Pritchard vs Bradford Gann / Kurt Reno6-1, 6-1
2021-08-18vs CSRC BARBERWon 10
W#1 SinglesLance McClelland vs Mike Guinn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-11vs MEMPK WITHEROWWon 10
W#1 DoublesTroy Kittelson / Michael Cook vs Joshua Pace / Nick Best6-0, 6-0
2021-08-04vs LFTCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesTroy Kittelson / Brad Michelson vs Cederick Dark / Stephen Fillo6-1, 7-6
2021-07-28vs MEMPK BODLAKWon 20
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Brad Michelson vs Chad Houchin / Pelham Sean6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTroy Kittelson vs Rick Bodlak6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lance McClelland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Don Borchelt
published 3.5
3.24
Troy Kittelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Nathan Pritchard
published
2.93
Brad Michelson
published 3.5
Roger Meurer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance McClelland + Troy Kittelson11756% games+5.1% vs expected
Nathan Pritchard + Troy Kittelson7650% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lance McClelland
89W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Don Borchelt
26W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Troy Kittelson
69W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Nathan Pritchard
24W–34L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
3.5
Brad Michelson
22W–44L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Roger Meurer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.