Teams

Wild Things/Barnacascel/Walnut Creek

2025 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-05vs Net Gains/Nandipati/San FranciscoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Logan / Susan Aneja vs Emily Steinglass / Annie Yang6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrigitte Shaw / Kathy Maratukulam vs Sirisha Nandipati / Christine Yeh3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmber Golini / Valerie Epting vs Robin Inaba / Sonal Patel6-0, 6-3
2025-04-04vs Between the Lines/Blevins/DanvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Hill / Susan Aneja vs Tricia Jacob / Mary Carse0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Kay / Brigitte Shaw vs Sharon Klein / Lauren Volpi1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmber Golini / Valerie Epting vs Sarah Blevins / Jenna Bullis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Amber Golini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.62
Susan Aneja
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kathy Maratukulam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Angela Logan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Stefanie Cohen
published
3.33
Rebecca Kay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Brigitte Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Valerie Epting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Mary Soe
published
2.91
Malou Matthew
published
2.44
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Kay + Kathy Maratukulam404 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Kay + Valerie Epting123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Golini
36W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Susan Aneja
37W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kathy Maratukulam
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
4
Angela Logan
28W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Stefanie Cohen
72W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Brigitte Shaw
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Valerie Epting
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Mary Soe
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Malou Matthew
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Cara Mia Barnacascel
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.