Teams

Tatum#1-2.5-40's

2026 Adult 40&Over-PB · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-27vs Tatum#2-2.5-40'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Stephens / Sonya Graves vs Aimee Cotton / Jennifer Weatherell6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Burge vs Wilhelmina Jarvis6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica Lott / Michelle Wilson vs Petra Schneider-Redden / Mary Breland5-7, 4-6
2026-04-13vs Tatum#2-2.5-40'sLost 12
W#1 DoublesWyn Payne / Amanda Stephens vs Jennifer Weatherell / Michelle Knight7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJessica Lott vs Wilhelmina Jarvis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLennie Schilling / Jennifer LaPar vs Aimee Cotton / Mary Breland2-6, 1-6
2026-03-02vs Tatum#2-2.5-40'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hooks / Michelle Wilson vs Denise Weeks / Jennifer Bishop6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLennie Schilling vs Carol Pittman0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWyn Payne / Amanda Stephens vs Aimee Cotton / Petra Schneider-Redden6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tatum#1-2.5-40's2154983
2Tatum#2-2.5-40's12451082

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Bettie Collins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Amanda Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Mary Kathryn Burge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Cindy Hooks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.05
Sonya Graves
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.01
Jessica Lott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.96
Lennie Schilling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.93
Jennifer LaPar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carol Russell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wyn Payne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bettie Collins
18W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Amanda Stephens
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
Mary Kathryn Burge
10W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Cindy Hooks
4W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Sonya Graves
2W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jessica Lott
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Lennie Schilling
3W–35L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Jennifer LaPar
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Carol Russell
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wyn Payne
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.