Teams

1-CYu-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-26vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCC 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Pierce / Drew Scruggs vs Ruth Caccavale / Kim McWhorter5-7, 1-6
2023-09-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie Gokey / Kristy Clare vs Mary Carter Taub / Tracy Crowley4-6, 5-7
2023-09-14vs 2-GLoFrese-Eno 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesShelly Guo / Drew Scruggs vs Hannah White / Alexa Hartenstein6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Chiles / Kristy Clare vs Leslie Jackson / Debbie Baker6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-29vs 3-KLaan-Eno-6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDrew Scruggs / MacKenzie Gokey vs Cathy Joyce / Maria Sanchez5-7, 2-6
2023-08-24vs 11-SBrogden-Eno 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Chiles / Shelly Guo vs Adriana Doi / Kathleen Guerra7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesIlene Farkas / Kristy Clare vs Berna Tareen / Susan Brogden2-6, 3-6
2023-08-01vs 10-LCaldwell-SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Chiles / Caroline Yu vs Melissa Coward / Laura Caldwell6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Shelly Guo
published
3.25
Amanda Pierce
published 3.5
3.12
Emma Gould
published 3.5
3.01
Drew Scruggs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Kristy Clare
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
MacKenzie Gokey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Yu + Megan Chiles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Shelly Guo
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Amanda Pierce
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emma Gould
9W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Drew Scruggs
59W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Kristy Clare
41W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
MacKenzie Gokey
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Jacqueline Yurkovich
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.