Teams

ALawler (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs PTighe (Blakeney)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMAGESH ARUMUGAM / Oluseun Alli vs Benjamin Bergeson / Fernando Gevaerd5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVladislav Valtsis / George Koskinas vs Patricio Aycinena / Rodney Myers5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Creange / Larry Hunt vs Timothy Hodge / PATRICK TIGHE6-7, 1-6
2026-08-18vs JChung/LBanchik (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Stein / George Koskinas vs Luciano Gueikian / Piotr Zawisza5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Twer / Eloy ROY vs Claude Underwood / Kenneth Mertzel4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKrishna Nidadavolu / Larry Hunt vs CJ ONeill / Sean Wright0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Oluseun Alli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Andrew Lawler
published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Stein
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Jonathan Roemig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Michael Twer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Vladislav Valtsis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Todd Creange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
George Koskinas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Eloy ROY
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Krishna Nidadavolu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oluseun Alli
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Andrew Lawler
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Kevin Stein
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Jonathan Roemig
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Michael Twer
50W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Vladislav Valtsis
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Todd Creange
53W–96L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
George Koskinas
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
70W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Eloy ROY
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Krishna Nidadavolu
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.