Teams

LATA18/Huffman/CAMP

2024 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Men - 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-12vs LATA18/Small/LCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Chris Sinegar vs Joshua Simons / Adam Chittam6-4, 7-6
2024-08-11vs LATA18/Kitchens/SSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesMARTIN CATOLICO / Michael Turner vs Aaron Hilton / Garrett Prochaska5-7, 1-2
2024-07-29vs LATA18/ESTES/CTFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Turner / MARTIN CATOLICO vs Timothy Hamrick / Luke Reynolds1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-22vs LATA18/Small/LCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRandy Basinger / Brandon Doty vs Ely Grote / Adam Chittam6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMARTIN CATOLICO / Michael Turner vs Dargan Gore / Ben Freiburger6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-15vs LATA18/Kitchens/SSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Jeff Howle vs Kevin Felkel / Bryan Lynip3-6, 4-6
2024-07-08vs LATA18/ESTES/CTFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Huffman / Brandon Doty vs Dawson Thornton / Dandavikranth Reddy2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Chris Sinegar
published 4
3.85
Brandon Doty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Tom Bane
published
David Terry
published 4
3.62
MARTIN CATOLICO
published
3.60
Greg Prevost
published
3.49
William Joachim
published
3.34
Jeff Howle
published
3.29
Randy Basinger
published
3.25
Michael Turner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Chris Stader
published 3.5
Jeffrey Hauser
published
John Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bane + Chris Sinegar8263% games+6.9% vs expected
Randy Basinger + William Joachim213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Sinegar
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Tom Bane
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
David Terry
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
MARTIN CATOLICO
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.62
Greg Prevost
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
William Joachim
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jeff Howle
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Randy Basinger
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Michael Turner
112W–108L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Chris Stader
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jeffrey Hauser
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Pierce
52W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.