Teams

JRoss-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-13vs GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnna Hodges vs Leslie Boesch1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Donna Bauman2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Beth Huebner2-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs AHoots-TOCHWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnna Hodges vs Cathy Joyce6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChace Ogle vs Lynne Davis6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Kyrsten Le6-4, 6-3
2026-06-17vs LHabib-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Zoe Dubrow6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnna Hodges vs Sapna Varkey6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChace Ogle vs Tiffany Langino6-0, 6-3
2026-06-10vs APlachco-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Smita Paranjape6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnna Hodges vs Ana Plachco0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesValerie Acre vs Kim El6-1, 6-2
2026-06-03vs GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Leslie Boesch0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Amy Beth Kessinger0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Geraldine Smith0-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs AHoots-TOCHLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Madeline Finley5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Amy Hoots1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesChace Ogle vs Cathy Joyce6-2, 6-0
2026-05-13vs APlachco-DURLost 12
W#1 SinglesAnna Hodges vs Cheryl Reid6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Ana Plachco5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Kim El1-6, 3-6
2026-05-06vs LHabib-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Sapna Varkey6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Lina Habib7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Katya Lundberg6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Amanda Linke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Anna Hodges
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Chace Ogle
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.98
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.92
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.79
Justyne Ross
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.7% vs expected
Valerie Acre + Amanda Linke5063% gamesnot enough data
Justyne Ross + Anna Hodges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Linke
46W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Anna Hodges
7W–14L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Chace Ogle
15W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Valerie Acre
131W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.