Teams

PLEASANTON 18MX8.0B

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesLisa Saporito / Scott Schafer vs Michelle Dayco / Antonio Ambriz7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Wisser / David Wisser vs Daljeet Singh / Harish Natarajan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPriya Kudlu / Vishal Saboo vs Vikram Kadi / Caroline D Sherbourne7-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKermit Strachan / Rebecca Newborn vs Erik Amundson / Jennifer Dinh0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPriya Kudlu / Kim Matias vs Harish Natarajan / Daljeet Singh3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDan Copenhagen / Teresa King vs Vikram Kadi / Gina Chen4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Gene Huang
published
3.95
Scott Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Dan Copenhagen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Vishal Saboo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Rebecca Newborn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Priya Kudlu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
David Wisser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
published
3.68
Karen Wisser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Peng Qu
published
3.23
Lisa Saporito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Hankins
published
Kim Matias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Schafer + Lisa Saporito4161% gamesnot enough data
David Wisser + Karen Wisser4164% gamesnot enough data
Priya Kudlu + Vishal Saboo404 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Copenhagen + Dan Copenhagen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gene Huang
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Scott Schafer
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Dan Copenhagen
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Vishal Saboo
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Rebecca Newborn
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Priya Kudlu
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
David Wisser
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Karen Wisser
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Peng Qu
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Lisa Saporito
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelly Hankins
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Matias
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Carey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.