Teams

TOC.Perian

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-29vs TOC.VergheseWon 20
W#2 SinglesSantha Perian vs Uday Parikh6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesPraveen Krishnamurthy vs Srinivas Govindaraju7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-29vs TOC.VergheseWon 10
W#1 SinglesJonathan Wade vs Sandeep Verghese4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-25vs TOC.VergheseWon 20
W#2 SinglesRahul Narang vs Sandeep Verghese7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPraveen Krishnamurthy vs Michael Pachel6-2, 6-0
2025-08-03vs TOC.VergheseLost 02
L#2 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Uday Parikh4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesSantha Perian vs Srinivas Govindaraju2-6, 1-6
2025-08-03vs TOC.VergheseWon 20
W#2 SinglesPraveen Krishnamurthy vs Srinivas Govindaraju6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Michael Pachel6-1, 6-0
2025-08-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesRahul Narang vs Michael Pachel6-2, 6-1
2025-06-24vs TOC.VergheseWon 21
W#1 SinglesPraveen Krishnamurthy vs Chirag Patel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRahul Narang vs Srinivas Govindaraju3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSantha Perian vs Michael Pachel6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Jonathan Wade
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.18
Praveen Krishnamurthy
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4.5
4.06
Rahul Narang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
4.05
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.91
Santha Perian
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.88
Abhi Bhirud
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Santha Perian + Praveen Krishnamurthy271158% games+5.9% vs expected
Rahul Narang + Praveen Krishnamurthy882759% games+3.7% vs expected
Santha Perian + Rahul Narang7456% games+3.5% vs expected
Santha Perian + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil7359% games−0.4% vs expected
Rahul Narang + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil4254% gamesnot enough data
Praveen Krishnamurthy + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Wade
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Praveen Krishnamurthy
242W–128L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Rahul Narang
298W–125L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
203W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Santha Perian
210W–109L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4.5
Abhi Bhirud
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.