Teams

MHanauer-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-18vs EAnderson-DFCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Eric Pollak5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Charles Wood6-4, 6-2
2025-11-11vs JByrd-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAaron Yip vs Herman Gudjonson1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Ben Spickard7-6, 6-3
2025-11-04vs JLundberg-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Luc Sanchez6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEvan Dorner vs Joshua Lundberg1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Al Pick6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-01vs SLlewellyn-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Spencer Llewellyn6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Parv Mital2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-21vs JClough-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAaron Yip vs Krishna Vallabhaneni2-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Matt Piland6-2, 6-4
2025-10-13vs EAnderson-DFCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Nathaniel McGee6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Rod Snyder6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Zack Czajkowski
published
Evan Dorner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Aaron Yip
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Daniel Martchek
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Jamil Qazi
published
3.73
Christopher Green
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Dorner + Aaron Yip123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Evan Dorner
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Aaron Yip
48W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
4.22
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jamil Qazi
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Christopher Green
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.