Teams

Moore

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 7.5 Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-31vs Cooper/RogersLost 03
L#1 DoublesKirsten Hancock / Allison Nicks vs Theresa Batoon / Leah Truitt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEva Gregory / Heidi Weaver vs Sonia Redwine / Jaime Marinaro2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGracie Santana / Antorrya Calderon vs Danielle Balzano / Katherine Wayles2-6, 0-6
2026-05-24vs Albus/TebeauxLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirsten Hancock / Allison Nicks vs Holly Friedman / Tiffany Mckelvey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEva Gregory / Heidi Weaver vs Sherrie Panter / Teresa Albus2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-23vs Anderson/HoytLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirsten Hancock / Jennifer Crawford vs Donna Schoolfield / Erika McCann2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGracie Santana / Antorrya Calderon vs Sandra Anderson / Teresa Robinson6-7, 0-6
2026-05-23vs SundaraLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirsten Hancock / Allison Nicks vs Monthiene Sundara / Jennifer Stringer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAntorrya Calderon / Gracie Santana vs Kim Nguyen / Brenda Howard4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cooper/Rogers31841093
2Anderson/Hoyt317513103
3Sundara135716118
4Moore0421022137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kirsten Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Eva Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Heidi Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Gracie Santana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Marcel Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Jennifer Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Allison Nicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Antorrya Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Weaver + Eva Gregory5652% games+5.1% vs expected
Gracie Santana + Antorrya Calderon41044% games−4.2% vs expected
Allison Nicks + Kirsten Hancock134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Hancock
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Eva Gregory
34W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Heidi Weaver
20W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Gracie Santana
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Marcel Kerr
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Jennifer Crawford
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Allison Nicks
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Antorrya Calderon
7W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.