Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-13vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaylen Yue / Ria Mendoza vs Catherine Fogelman / Shelly Lyon6-3, 6-0
2025-06-05vs YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 SinglesRia Mendoza vs Sirisha Nandipati6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRia Mendoza vs Rita Williams2-6, 1-6
2025-05-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesRia Mendoza vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-01vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Maylen Yue vs Anne Herrera / Catherine Kelley6-0, 6-0
2025-04-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRia Mendoza vs Elizabeth Young3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Maddie Thomas
published
3.92
Maylen Yue
published
3.90
Sydney Pfaff
published
3.87
Elizabeth Carey
published
3.85
Anthea Pang
published 4
3.81
Lilian Kim
published
3.74
Ally Gwozdz
published 4
3.60
Dorsey O'Neill
published
3.53
3.47
Ria Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Lorie Lambert
published
3.36
Shan Lu
published
3.20
Paula Mangin
published
3.06
Lisa Shaw
published
Katerina Novitskaya
published
Sunye Vuong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ria Mendoza + Maylen Yue51046% games−5.0% vs expected
Maddie Thomas + Ally Gwozdz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maddie Thomas
61W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
Maylen Yue
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Sydney Pfaff
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Elizabeth Carey
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Anthea Pang
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Lilian Kim
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Ally Gwozdz
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Dorsey O'Neill
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Maria Isabella Canlas
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Lorie Lambert
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Shan Lu
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Paula Mangin
15W–24L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lisa Shaw
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.06
Katerina Novitskaya
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sunye Vuong
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.