Teams

DTC #1

2024 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 3.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-20vs SPANISH OAKSLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesJOHN CHAMSI / Mark Saad vs Hugo Olivares-Ponce / Jared Overholtzer2-6, 3-6
2024-08-13vs RED ROCK CC #1Lost 02
L#2 Male DoublesJOHN CHAMSI / Mark Saad vs Howard Rosenblatt / Michael Brewington6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 Male DoublesJames Campbell / Paul Mazur vs Damien Jordan / Marc Saggese1-6, 5-7
2024-08-06vs DTC #2Lost 01
L#1 Male DoublesRiley Judd / JOHN CHAMSI vs Matthew Terry / Tim Harrison3-6, 1-6
2024-07-30vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 01
L#2 Male DoublesJOHN CHAMSI / Roger Guzman vs Ken Kesick / Matthew Murillo2-6, 0-6
2024-07-16Won 20
W#1 Male SinglesPaul Mazur vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Male DoublesJOHN CHAMSI / William Rowerdink vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Blair McPhail
published 3.5
2.97
Riley Judd
published
2.84
Roger Guzman
published
2.77
Paul Mazur
usually #1 Male Singles 50%, also #3 Male Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
2.16
JOHN CHAMSI
usually #2 Male Doubles 60%, also #3 Male Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.09
Paul Scott
published
Mark Saad
published
William Rowerdink
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JOHN CHAMSI + William Rowerdink1835% games−2.7% vs expected
JOHN CHAMSI + Riley Judd3251% gamesnot enough data
Paul Scott + JOHN CHAMSI033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Scott + Paul Mazur123 matchesnot enough data
JOHN CHAMSI + Bryce Christensen213 matchesnot enough data
Roger Guzman + Blair McPhail033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blair McPhail
61W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Riley Judd
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Roger Guzman
31W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Paul Mazur
19W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bryce Christensen
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
JOHN CHAMSI
29W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Paul Scott
5W–59L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Mark Saad
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Rowerdink
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.