Teams

MG Holmes

2026 Spring USTA Mixed 18 & Over League-Montgomery · 4.0 18 & Over Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.90 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17vs Lagoon MontgomerySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie Calloway / Ladon Campbell vs Wesley Robinson / Molly Killingsworth7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Brown / Jarred Kaplan vs Margaret Herd / Trevor Boyer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Lagoon MontgomerySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAntonio Holmes / Janice Scott vs Margaret Herd / Trevor Boyer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSofi Gelabert / Trea Blair vs Justin Ward / Molly Killingsworth7-6, 6-0
2026-04-26vs Lagoon MontgomeryWon 20
W#1 DoublesVanessa Brown / Athar Tanveer vs Holly Sharp / Wesley Robinson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Calloway / Antonio Holmes vs Miriam Scharf / Trevor Boyer6-4, 6-2
2026-04-19vs Lagoon MontgomeryLost 12
L#1 DoublesAntonio Holmes / Leslie Calloway vs Albert Smith / Kelly Bibb2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSofi Gelabert / Thadeus Cacanindin vs Molly Killingsworth / Stephen Gratz6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAthar Tanveer / Janice Scott vs Margaret Herd / Trevor Boyer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Lagoon MontgomeryWon 30
W#1 DoublesAthar Tanveer / Sofi Gelabert vs Justin Ward / Molly Killingsworth6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDANITA ALLEN / Thadeus Cacanindin vs Wesley Robinson / Margaret Herd7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrian Cone / Alex Cone vs Holly Sharp / John Schindler6-3, 6-1
2026-03-15vs Lagoon MontgomeryWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Cone / Alex Cone vs Molly Killingsworth / Albert Smith6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDANITA ALLEN / Athar Tanveer vs Wesley Robinson / Holly Sharp3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAntonio Holmes / Janice Scott vs Margaret Herd / John Schindler6-4, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Lagoon MontgomeryWon 20
W#1 DoublesAthar Tanveer / Elizabeth Cobb vs Holly Sharp / Wesley Robinson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAntonio Holmes / Natali Wiedemann vs Margaret Herd / John Schindler7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 18 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MG Holmes5216513154

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Brian Cone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Jarred Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Elizabeth Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Trea Blair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Natali Wiedemann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Antonio Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
DANITA ALLEN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Leslie Calloway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Vanessa Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Athar Tanveer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Sofi Gelabert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Thadeus Cacanindin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Janice Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Alex Cone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ladon Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Cone + Alex Cone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Cone
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Jarred Kaplan
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Elizabeth Cobb
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Trea Blair
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Natali Wiedemann
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Antonio Holmes
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Leslie Calloway
43W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Vanessa Brown
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Athar Tanveer
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Sofi Gelabert
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Thadeus Cacanindin
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Janice Scott
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.44
3.5
Alex Cone
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Ladon Campbell
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.