Teams

Piedmont 40s 4.5 Mixed

2026 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 & over · 4.5 Mxd Tues

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-10vs Chapman 40s 4.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Leatherwood / Jessica Bair-Epps vs Zachary Tran / Amanda Arkaev6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Chapman 40s 4.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Jessica Bair-Epps vs Denise Speight / Bryan Vescio3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Rush / Chuck Burns vs Jane Owens / Kenny Winter4-6, 5-7
2026-07-22vs Chapman 40s 4.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Burns / Linda Helms vs Chris Chapman / Denise Speight2-6, 4-6
2026-06-21vs Chapman 40s 4.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesChuck Burns / Jessica Bair-Epps vs Chris Chapman / Denise Speight2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrad Johnson / Linda Helms vs Bryan Vescio / Jane Owens3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Leatherwood / Christina Rush vs Tiffany Brown / Richard McClenny3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Mxd Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chapman 40s 4.5 Mixed Tues PM40111474
2Piedmont 40s 4.5 Mixed0411123140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Christina Rush
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.19
Lee Picklesimer
published
4.17
David Leatherwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Linda Helms
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Jessica Bair-Epps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Rush
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
David Leatherwood
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Linda Helms
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.08
Jessica Bair-Epps
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.