Teams

Laredo Women's 3.0 De Luna

Adult 18 & Over League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.70 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-22vs Laredo Women's 3.0 CarvalhoLost 05
L#1 DoublesGABRIELA de LUNA / Amelie Jane vs Andrea Gallegos / Ana Alvarez4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMayela Saad vs Alejandra Pena1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel Gomez / Olivia Gonzalez vs Roxanna Muzza / Monica Acasuso5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMirian Mendoza vs Paulina Vega Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Santos / Sara Salido vs SELINA TREVINO / Gabriela Tawil0-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs Laredo Women's 3.0 CarvalhoLost 04
L#1 DoublesMinerva Santos / Mirian Mendoza vs SELINA TREVINO / Paulina Vega Gonzalez0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrenda Santos vs Amanda Barto0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOlivia Gonzalez / Raquel Gomez vs Ana Alvarez / Sara Lascari7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSara Salido vs Maria Diez1-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs Laredo Women's 3.0 CarvalhoLost 04
L#1 DoublesYvonne Casso / Mirian Mendoza vs Monica Acasuso / SELINA TREVINO2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrenda Santos vs Alejandra Pena0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGABRIELA de LUNA / Daniella Sada Paz vs Roxanna Muzza / Sara Lascari1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElsa Pena / Minerva Santos vs Gabriela Tawil / Andrea Gallegos0-6, 0-6
2026-05-14vs Laredo Women's 3.0 CarvalhoLost 04
L#1 DoublesOlivia Gonzalez / GABRIELA de LUNA vs Sara Lascari / Ana Alvarez1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrenda Santos vs Paulina Vega Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMirian Mendoza vs Amanda Barto1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniella Sada Paz / Elsa Pena vs Maria Diez / Roxanna Muzza0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Melissa Ahumada
published
2.77
Raquel Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Mayela Saad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Amelie Jane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Olivia Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
GABRIELA de LUNA
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Minerva Santos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Sara Salido
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.31
Brenda Santos
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.11
Mirian Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.11
Yvonne Casso
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.03
Daniella Sada Paz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Elsa Pena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Ahumada + Mayela Saad213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Ahumada
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Raquel Gomez
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Mayela Saad
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Amelie Jane
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Olivia Gonzalez
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
GABRIELA de LUNA
0W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Minerva Santos
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
Sara Salido
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Brenda Santos
1W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Mirian Mendoza
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Yvonne Casso
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Daniella Sada Paz
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Elsa Pena
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.