Teams

KY/BG/FEE

ADULT 40 & OVER · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04vs KY/PUR/SHERIDANLost 23
W#1 DoublesEliza Huffman / Kassie Smith vs Dana Sheridan / Anne Miller7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMartina Fee vs Barbara Kough3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGaye Flener / Susan Feazel vs Sarah House / Tammy Cook2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Maglinger / Sarah Law vs Laura Pitman / Elizabeth Crawford6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesJulie Isaac / Michelle True vs Penny Hunter / Sadie Humphreys6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-04vs KY/PUR/SHERIDANLost 14
W#1 DoublesMartina Fee / Shannon Maglinger vs Sadie Humphreys / Penny Hunter6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKassie Smith vs Barbara Kough3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEliza Huffman / Sarah Law vs Tammy Cook / Sarah House6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGaye Flener / Julie Isaac vs Dana Sheridan / Anne Miller1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesMichelle True / Susan Feazel vs Laura Pitman / Elizabeth Crawford1-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs KY/OWB/GRAY/CLAYTONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMartina Fee / Shannon Maglinger vs Carolyn Hume / Sarah Bivins6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMinda Schafer / Joan Douglas vs Mary Jochim / Christine Clements3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrina Rickard / Eliza Huffman vs Stephanie Gray / Kerry Bodenheimer6-2, 6-4
L#4 DoublesMichelle True / Sarah Law vs Julia Ray / Elizabeth Scheessele1-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs KY/OWB/GRAY/CLAYTONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMartina Fee / Shannon Maglinger vs Christine Clements / Carolyn Hume6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTrina Rickard / Minda Schafer vs Stephanie Gray / Mary Jochim6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEliza Huffman / Joan Douglas vs Brenda Clayton / Kerry Bodenheimer2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMichelle True / Sarah Law vs Elizabeth Scheessele / Julia Ray1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Trina Rickard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Kassie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.46
Susan Feazel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Michelle True
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Joan Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Eliza Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gaye Flener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Martina Fee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Minda Schafer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Maglinger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Maglinger + Martina Fee5075% gamesnot enough data
Eliza Huffman + Kassie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trina Rickard
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kassie Smith
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Susan Feazel
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Michelle True
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Joan Douglas
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Eliza Huffman
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gaye Flener
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martina Fee
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Minda Schafer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Maglinger
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.